Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liak Teng Lit

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 05:17, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Liak Teng Lit

Liak Teng Lit (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

A stub about the CEO of a hospital in Singapore. Does not assert notability beyond things one would expect of someone in his position. Delete. JFW | T@lk 21:15, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete Agree with the proposer. NobutoraTakeda 21:29, 15 July 2007 (UTC)This user has been banned and !vote has been stricken. [1]
  • Delete NN CEO. No RS=OR. the_undertow talk 22:52, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak keep Absurd argument--the CEO of, say, Massachusetts General, also does not show any more notability than one would expect of someone in his position. Large hospitals are usually important. But more details are needed to show this. DGG (talk) 02:33, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment. I would not say that the CEO of any hospital, even a large well-known hospital, is automatically notable solely by virtue of his position. There must be some other factors contributing to notability. ●DanMS • Talk 03:43, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep The subject in question had received a major distinguised award from the Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong. of Singapore. Surely this is a noteworty event. --Siva1979Talk to me 15:29, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak Delete I cant find anything notable about this person and I dont think the position being held is a notable one either. What award was it and is it a notable award? Corpx 17:48, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete per nominator, fails WP:BLP with a complete lack of reliable, non-trivial third party sources. Burntsauce 18:18, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete doesn't even assert notability to my eyes. SamBC 19:32, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Doesn't assert notability. Keb25 08:51, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.