Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lexigraf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was No consensus, copyright issue is resolved. 2D/1K Rx StrangeLove 04:47, 28 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Lexigraf

- Sorry people for making you feel that way. The whole approach was meant to present the inner workings of multilingual lexicographical projects and an approach to IT tools that need to be in place to get things done. To my knowledge the resources in this field are rather limited and a person that is looking for information about lexicography might be interested in an external link of this sort. And don't forget it was a research project.

It's advertising. The program is not actually well known or widely used. --Diderot 18:36, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

• Keep, A google search found 1,660 search results from a few diverse sources, it seems quite well known to me. The article could do with cleaning up but should be kept --Amxitsa 18:51, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

I'm getting 90 hits total, and I don't know how many are for Canadian and Swedish firms of the same name. I'm a professional lexicographer, and I have only barely heard of this software. --Diderot 19:29, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

• Copyvio from the page linked in the article: cleaning up is insufficient, the current text needs deleting, period. As to whether anything else should take its place, I'm uncertain; a lot of the Google hits seem to be for other things, such as the translation company "LEXIGRAF International AB". Can you point me to any references for people using the software other than Aristotle University? Haeleth 19:19, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete nn enough.Gator1 19:31, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete non notable and text is copyvio of abstract on link...--Isotope23 20:13, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
• Comment - Copyright owner has granted permission for use on Talk:Lexigraf. The original issue is still open. --Diderot 09:23, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.