Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lex loci rei sitae

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Hermione1980 21:23, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Lex loci rei sitae

Transwikify Massysett 03:56, 10 October 2005 (UTC)

• Strong keep, expand for essentially the same reasons as Lex fori, above. Notable legal concept, much more than a dicdef.  BD2412 ^talk 05:11, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and expand. This is obviously an important article. Carioca 05:17, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and expand as notable legal term. The US Supreme Court lists it in their glossary of legal terms which judges may alternatively use in their rulings or come across in reading see [1]. Capitalistroadster 05:36, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
• Strong Keep Notable legal latin with much room for expansion. Xoloz 15:00, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
• Strong and speedy keep, although this could likely be merged into a general lex loci article along with lex loci contractus and lex loci actus if they exist. Smerdis of Tlön 16:53, 10 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.