Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leticia Moreno

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. howcheng {chat} 17:35, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Leticia Moreno

NN violinist. Speedied then restored on request - Delete. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 22:25, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

• Keep. One of the most notable female violinist in the world. Make sure before adding you vote - . --Stoni^(talk) 22:25, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. "Considered internationally one of the most promising violinists of her generation", and she has several awards to prove it. I might add that I was about to speedy it and ended up working on it. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 22:56, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep. A very notable young viloinist. Just look at the people she studied under, and her award. Absolutely meets the criteria. Flyboy Will 22:56, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep meets WP:NMG as winning a significant prize from the Royal Philharmonic Society [1] and has played in concert halls throughout the world. Capitalistroadster 00:51, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Look at those awards. The fact that this could get speedied is frightening. -- JJay 02:03, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

IMPORTANT NOTE All those awards are redlinked or go to entirely unrelated articles. Verifiabilty is needed before we jump the gun. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 05:13, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

• Comment: Are you saying this is a devious hoax cooked up by those Royal Philharmonic troublemakers? [2]-- JJay 05:23, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
• Comment: Most of these awards are internatiotionally known and some have the name of a famous violinist. Perhaps it is a wikipedia fault not having many articles about international music awards. Verifiabilty is needed before we jump the gun. (Try Google!)-- Stoni^(talk) 12:13, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Please research before nominating...let alone speedying. If you don't have time to go to your local library or music conservatory, try an Internet search engine, such as this one. [[3]]. Sawney 13:55, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep this obvious hoax invented by the Royal Philharmonic Conspiracy just to fool naïve Wikipedians, as per JJay (sort of). u p p l a n d 17:55, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
• Weak delete unless verified. Stifle 02:10, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
  • What do you regard as unverified in this article? u p p l a n d 06:19, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.