Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Let's Get Invisible!

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Sango123 (e) 19:55, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Let's Get Invisible!

Prod removed, so bringing it to AfD. Unnotable book; this does not need its own article. Could be merged to R.L. Stine Eusebeus 15:38, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

• Merge with Goosebumps unless it can be expanded enough to get its own entry, which I doubt. -- Grafikm_fr 16:56, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Several of the Goosebumps books have their own articles and I fail to see why each of them can't have their own as they were extremely popular in their time and to a lesser degree, still are today. Needs to be expanded as do many of the other Goosebumps books, but worth keeping.--Cini 22:16, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. I'm just amazed it isn't a copyvio, which is more than can be said about The Haunted Mask, I think, though I haven't tested it yet. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 23:41, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep notable books from a notable book series. --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEMES?) 14:27, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep, bad faith nomination. Eusebeus is systematically bringing disputed prods to AfD without regard to merits of dispute. Monicasdude 14:14, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and cleanup (tag added).--Isotope23 15:16, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.