Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lessons of history

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. This is not Wikisource material since its's not an original source text. The argument for keeping is not particularly convincing, particularly the request for expert-only additions. -Splash^talk 00:00, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Lessons of history

Delete. At best, this is original research. By its nature this can never be more than pure opinion. JDoorjam Talk 19:33, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Unencyclopedic opinion masquerading (unsuccessfully) as an article. --Kinu 19:55, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep at least long enough to give the article a chance. Please note the embedded request that additions to the article consist entirely of quotes from established historians. I only put in a few items off the top of my head to get things started. Those would, naturally, be taken out as quotations from historians were added. Rick Norwood 23:02, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• Belongs in Wikiquote (if anywhere), not in Wikipedia. —Sesel 23:14, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.