Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Less is more

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - should be merged or turned into a disambig page or something - SimonP 23:14, Mar 30, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Less is more

Unencyclopaedic, not sure where it could be taken from here. Maybe if the thrust of the article was on the poem, it would work, but not as is. Grutness|^hello? 09:59, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• delete If we keep this we'd need articles about everybody's personal motto, whereas imho only exceptionally notable ones deserve an article of their own. If anything this article should be added to the article on Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, but I'm not certian it merits even that. Thryduulf 13:40, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep as disambig between that guy's motto and minimalism. Kappa 14:07, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Merge onto ludwig. Radiant_* 16:12, Mar 18, 2005 (UTC)
• If true, then Least is most. To maximize utility, I vote Delete. I agree with Thryduulf. Barno 17:40, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• No, more is less. Delete to increase encyclopedic content. Alphax ^τεχ 18:00, Mar 18, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete and make more room on wikiservers. ComCat 02:46, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, agree with Kappa. -Tim Rhymeless (Er...let's shimmy) 05:18, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.