Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Les Enfants D'ombre

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedily userfied per WP:SNOW and WP:BITE. Just zis Guy you know? 19:02, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Les Enfants D'ombre

Seems like a school project, or a NN play. Poorly written, although that is no criteria for deletion. No directs hits on google, and it is not a copyvio. Similar to nonsense, although it must make sense to the author. One contributor. Listed on AFD as contributor may wish to comment. Kareeser|^Talk! 00:12, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Unencyclopedic. -- Krash (Talk) 00:24, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NFT and WP:NOT. Royboycrashfan 00:35, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, not entirely sure what this is, but certainly not encyclopedic. Bad ideas 00:52, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NFT and WP:NOT a free text dump. --Kinu ^t/_c 01:05, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Reads like an original script. --Rockpocket 01:20, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as unencyclopedic / Wikipedia is not a publisher of creative works. — Adrian Lamo ·· 01:52, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as Wikipedia is not. —-- That Guy, From That Show! ^(talk) 2006-03-08 02:10Z

*cocks head* Come again? ;x — Adrian Lamo ·· 02:23, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom --Krashlandon (e) 02:29, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete or maybe keep as a near-perfect example of WP:NOT. --die Baumfabrik 02:33, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete WP:NFT -- Samir T C 07:50, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NFT and WP:NOT. --Terence Ong 08:38, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. savidan^{(talk) (e@)} 08:58, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Wikipedia is not a free host, blog, or webspace provider.  (aeropagitica)  11:09, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 12:39, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per everybody! Staxringold 12:54, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete somebody's unformatted play?! No, just no. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:07, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete reads like a Max Fischer play. Eivind 14:46, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. -- Alpha269 15:19, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Oh my. Well, it's public domain now, I should copy it and use it and keep all the money from the door! Mwahahahahaha... Oh, and did everyone suddenly get out of school? The a ton of votes right now. Grandmasterka 15:20, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, pursued by a bear. Smerdis of Tlön 15:29, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete in blind and sheep-like agreement. --AaronS 16:53, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.