Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leonor Rosser
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was withdrawn. The Evil Spartan 15:24, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Leonor Rosser
Article make significant claims of notability but fails to back up with any sources, google search provides little if anything to confirm. Notability tag has been up for 8 months Daniel J. Leivick 18:01, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
- Nomination withdrawn, revised google search parameters show evidence of notability. --Daniel J. Leivick 03:20, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Valrith 18:52, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Venezuela-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 23:15, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Evil Spartan 15:17, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Keep, Very notable on children Spanish television. I would like references added. But the subject of the article is notable.Callelinea 18:21, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
-
- That would be the cousin of WP:JNN. If you can't prove it or say why, then it doesn't help.
- I think that is an indication she is not notable. 68 is not very many, I get 26 and can assure you that I don't come close. --Daniel J. Leivick 02:06, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - because, of course, she has 68 ghits. The Evil Spartan 14:50, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. If you google for leonor origami -wikipedia you get well over 15,000 hits - evidently her stuff is usually referred to as "Origami by Leonor", so searching for Rosser misses a lot of references. I don't have time to actually follow any of these hits but it looks like she's pretty well-known in the kiddie circuit. Tualha (Talk) 03:07, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.