Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lenny Loosejocks

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete Gnangarra 11:34, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Lenny Loosejocks

Lenny Loosejocks (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)
Pullyapantsup, Australia (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Fails WP:N. Article was flagged with notability concerns six months ago, and still has no sources. McGeddon 14:01, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

  • I am adding Pullyapantsup, Australia to this nomination. It's the town Lenny Loosejocks "lives" in. Punkmorten 14:37, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 15:07, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, per nom. --Bill.matthews 16:59, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, per nom, also comment that it seems to be a particularly blatant example of [[WP:CRUFT|fancruft], if not outright advertising.--Yeti Hunter 23:24, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment. Believe it or not, this does get some hits on Google News Archives. [1] The question is whether it can be rewritten in an encyclopedic article using those sources. Capitalistroadster 03:24, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge Pullyapantsup, Australia to Lenny Loosejocks or Ezone. Remove / delete gallery of fair use images.Garrie 05:01, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - the game doesn't appear to have any notability. Orderinchaos 10:48, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep or at least Merge/rmv gallery per Garrie Kc4 19:04, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep considering that Lenny is a lot more notable then other things on Wikipedia. Comrade Graham 19:47, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Whether or not other, less notable articles haven't yet been deleted should not be a consideration in a deletion discussion. (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS) --McGeddon 20:54, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
If this article is deleted and you feel it justifies a deletion crusade, by all accounts I am prepared to cast my opinion on any article you bring forward to discuss.Garrie 23:46, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Please take a look at the original concerns. To establish notability you have to use reliable sources...not just say that he is popular. You need to cite sources in the article, which has never been done. --Bill.matthews 20:26, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Comment - There is now a source in the article. Kc4 03:27, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, non-notable logo. Needs decent third-party references/sources. Lankiveil 10:25, 29 June 2007 (UTC).
The article is hardly about Lenny as a logo and more as Lenny the character. Kc4 05:30, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete both as non-notable and borderline advertising.--cj | talk 06:02, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.