The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. — JIP | Talk 09:10, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
Not encyclopedic. I put a suggestion on the author's talk page to userfy this several days ago, but received no response. Delete or UserfyPburka 02:55, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
Speedy Delete as vanity Qaz(talk) 07:10, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
Delete not notable, unverifiable, unencyclopedic, etc. Gets 0 Google hits. Note to closing admin: please remember to delete the pictures as well. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 11:15, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.