Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leiths Group

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep (non-admin closure), Notability was established. Magioladitis (talk) 00:02, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Leiths Group

Leiths Group (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Seems to fail notability guidelines for companies. Magioladitis (talk) 15:24, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete. Nowhere in the article is any notability asserted for either this group or one of its subsidiaries. Keep. Without the references, there was no way one could have known. --Blanchardb-Me•MyEars•MyMouth-timed 15:39, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete, fails WP:CORP. Doctorfluffy (fart in my face) 16:25, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete. Clearly fails WP:CORP, per Blanchardb, no assertion of notability. WilliamH (talk) 17:12, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

  • Keep. Per the added references. Nice work. WilliamH (talk) 17:18, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep. I added some references. --Eastmain (talk) 20:45, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. --Eastmain (talk) 20:45, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep Notability established through mentions in several reliable independent sources. GaryColemanFan (talk) 22:11, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep with the material Eastmain has added. Just takes looking for it. (I had earlier changed the title from the subsidiary to the group, because one article on them is quite sufficient). DGG (talk) 01:06, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep per GaryColemanFan and thanks to Eastmain. JamesMLane t c 03:11, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment After the references added, I withdraw. I think we have to keep the article. -- Magioladitis (talk) 16:27, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep Obviously notable. Colonel Warden (talk) 16:51, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.