Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leisure (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the nomination was delete. Sango123 17:35, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Leisure (band)

Per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sotones Records. Fails multiple Google tests [1] [2] [3]. User's only contributions have been related to this group, their "record label" also up for AfD, and evolutionary theory. All of these may need to be examined. HumbleGod 08:15, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

• Comment Actually the more I think about it, this may qualify for speedy delete per WP:VAIN and db-bio, etc. HumbleGod 08:22, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

• Nope; "Only those articles where there is no remotely plausible assertion of notability should be considered for speedy deletion." You can have a regular Delete from me, though! RGTraynor 09:23, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per above. DarthVader 09:24, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• You guys all know a lot more about wikis than us; sorry for the confusion (same goes for the discussion on Sotones stuff as explained there.)--Comrade jo 11:42, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete' as non-notable band Travelbird 14:03, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - per nom. --Kungfu Adam ^(talk) 18:42, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Hope this doesn't set the 'Southampton avant-punk scene' back too far though. --Coil00 23:36, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.