Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LeisureTime Network

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 20:53, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] LeisureTime Network

Author removed prod. Has four links in the article to exactly the same web page with advertising and untimely news. Hardly any hits on Google. Fails WP:WEB and WP:CORP. KarenAnn 12:22, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as non-notable and spam. Most Google hits are generated by the site itself or its author. Fireplace 12:33, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom, and above. Jefffire 12:35, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and Fireplace. Borderline speedy A7, no assertion of notability. Paddles ^T_C 23:06, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, as it's recently been rewritten by Draicone, removing the ad-speak.--Firsfron of Ronchester 03:54, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment Note that no changes have been made to the article since the AfD began, so the above discussion already takes into account Draicone's edits. Fireplace 04:38, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment According to the article's history, it was prodded on July 18th. Draicone reworked the article, and left this edit summary: (Remove delete tag: concerns addressed in wikification.) It was then sent here to AFD by the same user who prodded the article in the first place. I feel the spam concern has been for the most part addressed, which is why my vote was for keep.--Firsfron of Ronchester 04:53, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.