Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leifs Hus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 07:13, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Leifs Hus

Leifs Hus (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

I'm pretty sure this is a hoax, but I thought I'd bring it here instead of just prodding it to be sure, since any sources would probably be in a language I can't read. Googling the major terms in the article hasn't found anything that looks at all promising in any language, though, and all the contributions are from a limited number of editors who have edited almost nothing else. Pinball22 18:25, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

  • Speedy delete as obvious hoax. It failes the Google test: [1]. It is badly formatted, missing wiki-links; but with some red links. The only sourced is a MySpace type site:[2]. Bearian 18:52, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as suspected hoax. Google searches at www.google.se and www.google.no don't turn up anything seemingly connected to this. Eddie.willers 19:05, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete as hoax and nonsense. Dr bab 20:09, 2 May 2007 (UTC).
  • Speedy delete per above. The reference to kiwifruit calls it out as obvious nonsense - the fruit is native to China and would be unknown to a Norse religion. Zetawoof(ζ) 20:41, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete religioncruft. JuJube 04:53, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete WP:NFT. Punkmorten 10:51, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom, fails the everything test. RFerreira 07:16, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. As a native Norwegian speaker, I can confirm that all the so-called sources are just garbage. Arsenikk 17:52, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.