Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Legolism

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Dmcdevit·t 07:27, August 17, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Legolism

A word or phrase that has been recently coined. (A Neologism!). -Satori 22:07, 9 August 2005 (UTC)

• Delete What else is there to add? Sonic Mew | talk to me 22:12, August 9, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Blaise Douros

I've heard it used, and not at this St. Olaf place.

• Delete neologism --IByte 22:51, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as a non-notable neologism, although ironically this vote would be a Legolism if only my ears were pointier and I had mad longbow skilz.--Scimitar ^parley 23:19, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable neologism. --Revolución (talk) 23:35, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delegolas - neolegolism. -- BD2412 ^talk 01:04, August 10, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, neologism. ral315
• Delete as neolologism. --Several Times 15:37, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
• KEEP I have heard this used in several places due to the lack of lines given to Legolas that actually had any point, and for the purpose stated. Stating the ridiculously obvious is a Legolism. _{(previous unsigned comment by 216.129.191.143 (talk · contribs))}
• Delete. Neologism, and not even a very accurate one. "Blood has been spilled this night" is not an obvious statement to make, merely based on the color of a sunrise. A better fantasy film example of such a occurance is General Kael in Willow, whose every command is a blatantly obvious statement. "Get him!", "Where is the baby...look everywhere!", "after him!" -R. fiend 16:12, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
• Dude, even if this wikipedia place doesn't have it as an official word, who cares? Whoever is silly enough to actually argue over whether it gets kept or not, it will still be a word! The word rocks! I say keep it, but who cares? _{(previous unsigned comment by 138.129.89.20 (talk · contribs))}

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.