Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Wong
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Grue 20:12, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Lee Wong
Reason entry was created by a prankster 165.21.154.117 16:30, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete no IMDb hits that correspond to eith "Lee Wong" or "Lim Poh Huat" as pertain to this article. Thanks to Thatdog for restoring the original content here to make a more informed decision. Hamster Sandwich 16:36, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy delete: No content/Vaccous content Manik Raina 16:38, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
- Comment: This page was blanked by someone else from 165.21.154.x almost immediately before the VfD was added. I've restored the old content, please base your votes on this version rather than the blank one. - Thatdog 16:55, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as non-verifiable. Hall Monitor 23:57, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete nn film. Come back if it makes it big. --Etacar11 00:39, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, verified in http://www.filmfestivalrotterdam.com/en/film/34930.html. Therefore, 2 of the above delete votes should not be counted. --Vsion 23:40, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
- Comment Well since I voted on the basis of the lack of his IMDb entry I will presume that you aren't including me as a vote that should change. I did go and look at that link you put up, and it indicates a short film of 22 minutes. I personally don't feel that this single appearence in a short subject film shown at a fil festival makes the subject of the article notable. There is no indication here that the film was ever distributed to an audience beyond the scope of this festival in 2003. Thanks for doing the research though, I appreciate it. Hamster Sandwich 03:13, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
- No, I wasn't refering to your vote, but rather the "non-verifiable" and "No content" votes. --Vsion 17:21, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
- Comment Well since I voted on the basis of the lack of his IMDb entry I will presume that you aren't including me as a vote that should change. I did go and look at that link you put up, and it indicates a short film of 22 minutes. I personally don't feel that this single appearence in a short subject film shown at a fil festival makes the subject of the article notable. There is no indication here that the film was ever distributed to an audience beyond the scope of this festival in 2003. Thanks for doing the research though, I appreciate it. Hamster Sandwich 03:13, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. That said, it is rare indeed for Singaporean film makers to have their films screened in international festivals like these, and what is particularly note worthy is that this was her first film, quite an unusual feat in Singapore's context. In addition, female film makers are all the more rarer here. Notability of a person isnt always measured just by the number of films produced. I believe there is scope for an expansion on this page, and it does not have to rely on the web alone.--Huaiwei 05:14, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete unless expanded. — Instantnood 08:35, August 11, 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.
