Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee High School
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was SPEEDY KEEP. The original article was replaced with a useful disambig, and the nomination was withdrawn. - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 00:27, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Lee High School
Non-notable highschool, no context, doesn't even say where the school is (city, state) --W.marsh 17:38, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
This is currently a speedy delete candidate, under CSD criterion A1, unless it is expanded to establish context.- A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 17:46, 5 October 2005 (UTC)- It currently has no context, but it isn't short :) Kappa 17:55, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- While your update is interesting and more coherent, do we really need a disambig page linking to 2 nonexistant pages? --W.marsh 18:03, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- Well it has inbound links too, so yes. Kappa 18:22, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- Two sentences and the fight song is short in my book. In any case, keep the disambig. - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 19:07, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- While your update is interesting and more coherent, do we really need a disambig page linking to 2 nonexistant pages? --W.marsh 18:03, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- It currently has no context, but it isn't short :) Kappa 17:55, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, useful disambig, and per Wikipedia:Schools/Arguments#Keep Kappa 18:22, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep the new disambig page, which really has nothing to do with the original article. I assume (but don't know) the author was thinking of the one in Michigan (based on their IP). But the original version is now unimportant. The new disambig is useful given the commonality of the name, and existence of a couple blue-links. --rob 18:40, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- Yes I must agree that the new disambig page is okay... it even links to existing articles. Nice work. --W.marsh 19:02, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep and withdraw AfD nomination ASAP.--Nicodemus75 20:25, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- How do I withdraw a nomination? I'll be looking around the 500 deletion guideline pages and hopefully will figure out before too long... --W.marsh 00:21, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
- Like that; just say you want to withdraw the nomination, and if there are no objections, an admin (or any editor, really) will close it for you. I'm going to do that right now. - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 00:27, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
- How do I withdraw a nomination? I'll be looking around the 500 deletion guideline pages and hopefully will figure out before too long... --W.marsh 00:21, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep and delist from Articles for deletion as per Nicodemus75. Silensor 20:37, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep CalJW 22:04, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep useful disambig page.Gateman1997 22:10, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.