Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lector Latinus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:29, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Lector Latinus

nn software with only three Google hits. Article created by the software's programmer. User:Zoe|^(talk) 00:13, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Sounds like cool software, but of those three Google hits, one is unrelated, one is the software's own homepage, and one is a Geocities page. Doesn't seem notable yet. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 00:36, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, and if it was created by the author of the software, it's likely original research. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:51, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable, fails WP:SOFTWARE --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 02:28, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
• Lector Latinus delendus est non est notabilis Bucketsofg 03:42, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. Funnybunny 03:45, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as WP:VANITY, WP:SOFTWARE per nom and Mr. TBC. Kuru ^talk 03:57, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per all -M^ask 05:01, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Royboycrashfan 06:35, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, vanity, nn software, self promotion and per nom. --Terence Ong 10:01, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per User:Terence Ong--Luccent 10:08, 30 March 2006 (UTC) (oops forgot to sign it the first time)
• Delete Non-notable Celcius 13:06, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delendus est indeed, as per Buckets
• Delete per nom. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 15:20, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. -Haon 00:52, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. —-- That Guy, From That Show! ^(talk) 2006-03-31 01:52Z
• Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 01:12, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete smells like spam. --Jon Calla 03:59, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.