Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lecd

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. W.marsh 17:49, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Lecd

Unsourced and no web search hits apart from a patent application, unclear that this actually exists Rich257 21:01, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

• Keep 23 google hits For "Light emitting Ceramic Device" Not paper. The information is verifable. This is a new technology, so the Google hits are not abundant. Notability does not come into play. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 23:01, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete for the exact same reasons presented as rationale for keep above. 23 unique and 56 total Google hits is nothing. It's a new technology, which means it should have tons of G-hits if anybody has heard about it- if the web is ever abuzz about anything (besides celebrity sex tapes), it's new technology. Of course notability matters- it always does. -- Kicking222 23:30, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Many of those 23 google hits are about the patent that was lodged in 2002 and granted in the US in 2004. I don't see patent applications as proof of existence, nor does the patent application seem to prove any of the claims in the article. It's four years since the patent has been applied for and apparently no actual devices yet. Rich257 08:43, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Looks like they do have a product out "The company's first product to the consumer market is the Firefly Light Tray". View image: [1]. 70.57.246.220 00:22, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.