Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leam Lane

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 20:50, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Leam Lane

Leam Lane (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Prod removed, a vandalism hotspot, and a non-notable, non-verifiable article The Rambling Man 23:52, 26 January 2007 (UTC) •

• Delete NN --rogerd 12:04, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Nishkid64 20:32, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

• Merge to Gateshead - not notable enough outside the local area to merit its own article. Walton monarchist89 20:38, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

• Comment Is the article as it stands even accurate? I've consulted maps which show a road called Leam Lane, but no suburb by that name. Incidentally, there is a biography of Catherine Cookson called The Girl From Leam Lane - apparently she was born there. AdorableRuffian 16:42, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

• Keep. Gateshead council website lists a ward called Wardley and Leam Lane. Entering NZ295607 into the OS's get-a-map shows a place called Leam Lane, with a pool & a library, near a Roman road, per the article. Google finds "Fewster Square" per the article.The census lists a population of 9000 in a ward called Leam which is where the article says it should be. I think we'll just have to be eventualists on this one. Vandalism is not a reason for deletion. Mr Stephen 22:40, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Find sources: Leam+Lane — news, books, scholar Addhoc 10:09, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

• Delete above searches don't indicate any non-trivial mentions outside local press. Addhoc 10:12, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.