Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leaderboard Golf
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 00:42, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Leaderboard Golf
Substub; fails WP:FICT WP:PRODUCT. Lea (talk) 22:06, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Someoneanother 02:58, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete The article was created as a stub (with a reference) in hopes that as additional information was made available, the page would be updated. Instead, the single reference has now been removed and the page hasn't been expanded. -Digiwrld1 (talk) 03:29, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - I think we should at least give it a chance. D.M.N. (talk) 16:03, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Hasn't been edited since September 2007, and highly unlikely that it will be fixed. Gman124 (talk) 16:40, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 19:38, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
- Weak delete - Metacritic shows that it has one professional review, by Official Playstation 2 Mag UK. However, multiple sources are preferable for WP:N (nothing at IGN or GameSpot other than token entries). A single source is enough for inclusion in a more generic article, though, such as List of golf video games. Marasmusine (talk) 09:17, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Needs multiple reliable sources which cover it in detail, in order to satisfy WP:N and in order to have something resembling an article. It was apparently due to come out for Wii, but it seems to just disappear, was it dropped from that console? Apart from that, it was released on PS2 and PC, but by Midas Interactive, a budget label whose marketing budget consists of a few dust bunnies and an elastic band. Almost all of these budget releases never receive enough attention to sustain articles, the mainstream press just isn't interested in them. Someoneanother 23:08, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.