Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lazy Sunday Afternoons

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:24, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Lazy Sunday Afternoons

Non-notable (student?) film. Doesn't even appear in IMDB. Misterwindupbird 00:29, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete as non-notable movie --TBC??? ??? ??? 01:06, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete not notable. - Richardcavell 01:41, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete NN — ßottesiηi Tell me what's up 02:52, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, nn film. --Terence Ong 02:54, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete It isn't notable. Jude (talk,contribs,email) 03:43, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per above. SorryGuy 03:46, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Not notable. --Thorpe | talk 14:51, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as per above/nom.
  • Delete, before some wicked goverment finds this movie and uses it to torture people. -- Heptor talk 21:20, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete and Redirect to Lazy Sunday Afternoon, a hit for the Toy Dolls. Just zis Guy you know? 23:20, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, this is the 40th Dogme 95 film. It is listed in the wikipedia entry for Dogme and on the Dogme website - http://www.dogme95.dk/dogme-films/filmlist.asp. It might be notable for this reason only, but that still makes it notable enough in my eyes. Anyway... probably a bit pointless saying this, but I thought I'd do so nonetheless --Sammysam 10:40, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment. There are well over 100 Dogme films now. All that appears to be required is filling in an online form in which you state you feel your film adheres to the Dogme "vow of chastity" (which this film clearly doesn't, in any case, though few, if any, Dogme films do). According to the Dogme95 FAQ, on how to become Dogme certified: "it is all up to the new Dogme95 directors. It’s up to their conscience and personal judgement."[1] --Mr Wind-Up Bird ✈ 19:17, 24 April 2006 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.