Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laxmi Road

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge. Cbrown1023 talk 03:51, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Laxmi Road

Laxmi Road (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Notability is questionable, and this article has been in essentially the same useless state for more than a year. Delete. --Nlu (talk) 15:36, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep - lots of major shopping streets have their own articles at present, and as far as I know there's no specific policy on this issue. As to the article being in a "useless state", that can easily be fixed, and isn't necessarily a reason for deletion. Walton monarchist89 17:54, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge to the article on the town. There is no reason to have it as a seperate article. As for their being plenty of articles on shopping streets, that is in no way a criteria for inclusion. The same logic can be used in reverse- there is no article on my local shopping street, so why should there be here? Well, actually, it was decided [[1]] that it should be merged with the article on my local major town. I guess that is what should happen in this case too. J Milburn 18:05, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge with Pune. I agree with User:J Milburn.
  • Keep The main shopping street in a city with over 4 million population is notable. Besides, just a quick g-news archive search and I see Laxmi Road the subject of multiple Times of India articles [2] [3] [4]. Don't usually see streets or roads pass the letter of WP:NOTABILITY, but this one does. --Oakshade 06:05, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge per J Milburn, unless there is a substantial increase in information. As it stands currently, it's notable, but doesn't seem likely to expand beyond a stub. Chairman S. Talk Contribs 01:48, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.