Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lawmaster

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was merge and redirect to Judge Dredd. moink 01:17, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Lawmaster

Comicruft. All relevant information is already and should be on Judge Dredd. Delete. Kinu 01:27, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Royboycrashfan 01:29, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - As the article creator I'd like to see it kept, however I can see the argument for it perhaps not being notable enough on it's own. Perhaps an article on all the vehicles in the Judge Dredd universe rather than separate ones is a reasonable compromise? exolon 01:32, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete — Per nom. If there are more vehicles to be described, a new section in the Judge Dredd article would be the way to go. Redirects from vehicle names would also allow readers to gain context when looking up specific vehicles.
  — Bill W. (Talk) (Contrib) [ 22:38, 29 January 2006 (UTC) ]
• Jeez, just redirect it. No need to put it under afd. What's so hard about that? ⇒ JarlaxleArtemis 02:41, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
  • I didn't think a redirect was necessary. I wanted to delete it, and maybe I'm not the only one as per the above discussion. That's why I listed it on AfD. You can suggest a redirect without the attitude. Jeez. --Kinu 03:09, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
    • Deleting it isn't necessary, either. ⇒ JarlaxleArtemis 04:14, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
    • Ooh, Jeez is so incivil. ⇒ JarlaxleArtemis 04:16, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Kinu Ruby 03:37, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect, it's unlikely that anyone will look under this name for anything ut the Judge Dredd topic, so it'll be useful to have a redirect. I've seen no argument for why we need to delete this outright that couldn't be served better by redirects. Bill W above seems to almost be arguing for redirects too. Night Gyr 09:59, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect to Judge Dredd. I don't see any valid reason to delete this. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:05, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect to Judge Dredd per Mgm.--Isotope23 18:18, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect to Judge Dredd per Mgm. --bainer (talk) 08:14, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect as above. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 15:14, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.