Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laurence A. Pagnoni

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.--Kubigula (talk) 05:00, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Laurence A. Pagnoni

Laurence A. Pagnoni (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable. The subject looks like a very nice person and good professional, but I am having diffculty understanding why he should be in Wikipedia. News articles are scarce, relating to a protest he was part of in 1986 and a citation in a 1991 article. GHits (76) look to be trivial.--Legionarius (talk) 04:15, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete. I tagged the article for lacking sources about a month ago, but it has not really improved since. Delete as per nom. --Crusio (talk) 10:25, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JERRY talk contribs 20:35, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete. The article has no sources (though it does have lots of external links!) and hasn't been touched in nearly three weeks. I don't really see anything notable about this guy. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 21:35, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Weak delete unless there are articles about him--ifhe is as important as the article claims, there will be. DGG (talk) 22:30, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Weak delete sounds like an advertisement. Marlith T/C 22:31, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Weak delete per DGG notability may be verifiable but unless it's followed through with.....True theory (talk) 17:07, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment 69 Ghits, including Wikipedia. Just 50 hits if the middle initial is removed. --Crusio (talk) 18:41, 13 January 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.