Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lauren stuart

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete--JForget 01:43, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Lauren stuart

Lauren stuart (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Not notable; Lauren Stuart has been mentioned in a magazine, but I don't think this justifies having a Wikipedia article on her. --Akiyama 01:05, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete definitely nn. JJL 01:16, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete: Not notable-maybe once she is older than 30 something will happen. - Rjd0060 05:28, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete: One magazine article from her school does not equal notability. No other apparently relevant Ghits. SkierRMH 06:24, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete As has been noted, the article does not meet WP:BIO. --TeaDrinker 06:26, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete- fails WP:BIO Thunderwing 13:15, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete lowercase surname is proof of non-notability Will ^(talk) 14:20, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete not notable, one mention in a magazine does not make you notable and couldn't find anything on her in a google search. Oysterguitarist 14:54, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete jackx3 Not only is Ms. Stuart not notable by wikipedia standards but she has also denied playing a role in the action that merited her a spot in Jane Magazine's article on "30 Influential Women Under 30." —Preceding comment was added at 16:07, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.