Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lauren Conrad (4th nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep, nothing remotely resembling a reason for deletion given. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:21, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Lauren Conrad (4th nomination)

Lauren Conrad (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Friends of the subject of the article do not want a Wikipedia entry on her, even though she's notable. Look, if Daniel Brandt can try and get it deleted, so can I. Besides, I've worked on The Hills, so I know what I'm talking about. No conflict of interest here. Moorcoism 15:03, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

• Keep. This woman is notable enough to qualify for an article. You can't help yourself to a vanity piece if you don't qualify; by the same token you can't opt out if you do. The request is still further undermined by the fact that it does not come from the subject herself. BTLizard 15:12, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - "Friends" ?????? sorry, you will really need a better rationale before this article gets deleted. --TheDJ (talk • contribs • WikiProject Television) 15:14, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
• I know people who know and work with the subject: I worked on The Hills with the production crew, and yes, we've been to Wikipedia aaaages ago, heh, look at what Daniel Brandt can do, he tries and tries to get his article deleted - but - WHAM! - he fails - WE WON'T!! Cant you just courtesy blank it as you usally do?? --Moorcoism 15:16, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

You can claim to be jezus for all we care, that won't convince us you actually are jezus. Lauren or her legal representative can contact Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons#Legal_concerns if she wishes to be actually removed, because then identities can be verified and statements will be legally binding. The article is notable, proper and of reasonable encyclopedic value, so as far as this department is concerned it satifies all required policies. --TheDJ (talk • contribs • WikiProject Television) 15:25, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.