Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lauren Conrad (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy close as disruption. We have no evidence that Lagunabeacher (talk · contribs), Danielle at MTV Europe (talk · contribs), Carla at MTV Europe16 (talk · contribs) work for MTV, or that what they claim about the subject of this article is true, and given the regularity of these nominations, and the single-purpose accounts, it seems more likely that this is just the work of a single person intent on causing disruption rather than a genuine attempt to discuss whether Wikipedia should have an article on a subject. Uncle G 22:39, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Lauren Conrad
If Daniel Brandt can go to so much effort to get rid of his article, then I will on behalf of the subject of this one. I work for MTV Europe, and she's specifically requesting deletion of this. She claims "she's not a proper celeb", i.e. not notable enough for your standards. Danielle at MTV Europe 20:49, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy close Disruptive nomination in violation of WP:POINT. FrozenPurpleCube 20:55, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy keep this is the exact same reasoning for the last AfD and that resulted in Speedy keep. IrishGuy talk 21:32, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep per above. Georgia guy 21:43, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep ditto malatesta 21:53, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy keep Lauren Conrad seems perfectly notable to me. Acalamari 22:16, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. Per IrishGuy, this iis a textbook example of speedy keep. Straight from WP:CSK: "nominations of the same article with the same arguments after they were strongly rejected." Mwelch 22:18, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
