Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laurel Nakadate

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep, withdrawn by nominator with no delete !votes. --ais523 18:29, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Laurel Nakadate

Laurel Nakadate (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Although she may be a real person, the article seems full of nonsense.--Xnuala 22:25, 15 February 2007 (UTC).

• Keep The article may be in terrible shape but that is a reason to clean it up, not to delete it. Passes WP:BIO based on references [1] and [2]. --Selket ^Talk 01:09, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - adequate sourcing, but needs to be trimmed of excessive praise and logorrhea like "geopolitical gender transmogrification" ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 05:16, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
• Withdraw Nomination or change to Keep, I guess I was drawn in by the malicious bent of the original author! Next time I will be less hasty on the trigger finger. --Xnuala 14:48, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.