Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura Knight-Jadczyk

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Robert 00:57, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Laura Knight-Jadczyk

  • Delete per nom. This page is by the author of Cassiopean, also marked for deletion and similar in style and content to this page. It is pure vanity and nothing more. It would make an OK (but wordy) userpage, but doesn't belong as a Wikipedia entry. - Sensor 00:14, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, per nomination. Peruvianllama 00:23, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete per nomination. Allow userfication if requested but not fit for article space; sheer hagiography. -- Antaeus Feldspar 02:47, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete NN --Rogerd 05:27, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete per nomination.--Isotope23 13:25, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Strong Delete Wow every article by this person is sheer junk. They don't stay on topic. They rambele on forever. Half the time you can't understand what she's talking about. She refers to herself. But most of all: I don't even think these articles are acurate. Most of her stuff is based on the opinions of lunatics and obsqure studies which haven't been proven. I propose that we go through, delete every article she's made, and ban her. Tobyk777 15:41, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
Actually, I have proposed two of her three articles on Wikipedia for deletion. See Cassiopean. Please, delete with prejudice. - Sensor 05:24, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Vanity. *drew 21:06, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, nn crank Majts 21:40, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, non-notable vanity post with POV --Fsdfs 23:42, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete as per nominator. And let's keep an eye on the author. MCB 04:56, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
Comment: in that vein, check out Cassiopaeans and 6th density. Tearlach 18:34, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.