Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lasto
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. —Xezbeth 15:05, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Lasto
Looks like web forum vanity to me. [1] alexa shows no traffic information (meaning not within top 100 000) and Wikipedia is not a web directory. Delete. Sasquatch′↔Talk↔Contributions 00:35, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete: Forum with no real purpose, it says. Wikipedia is not a web guide. Geogre 02:43, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy. It's not a forum itself, rather forum software such as phpBB2, that costs, making this spam. Jamyskis Whisper, Contribs 08:28, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- No vote, but I object to the above call to speedy delete it, after all we have an article on vBulletin which people must pay for, and DiscussionBoard, which itself was subject to a VfD which it survived. And also, it's free to use for non-profit organisations. Talrias (t |
e | c) 12:15, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
-
- Fair enough, I should have explained myself a bit better with the speedy vote. vBulletin is a very popular program. It is used by many sites, regardless of the fact that its costs money and there are free alternatives around. Indeed, Lasto is also "free" to non-profit groups, but it still makes money from other groups and is, by my reckoning, inherently nn - to date I have not found a single board that uses this software. Jamyskis Whisper, Contribs 13:56, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
