Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Last Name
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Withdrawn with consensus to keep, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 02:20, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Last Name
Violates WP:CRYSTAL; very little is known about this single yet. The only claims in the song are primarily unsourced and the song hasn't charted yet -- it probably won't for another month. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 20:59, 13 March 2008 (UTC) Withdrawn per addition of sources. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 22:26, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 21:00, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
*Delete until it charts. --Caldorwards4 (talk) 21:06, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
- Keep as sources have been found. --Caldorwards4 (talk) 01:01, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
-
- What's the point in deleting it if we know it's going to be a single? Plenty of articles on future singles that have not yet charted are on Wikipedia. Some singles never chart at all, but they still have pages. There's no point in deleting the page and then having to recreate it in a few weeks. Plus I added sources on the reception of the track, so that's not unsourced anymore. WIKI-GUY-16 (talk) 16:11, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- Also how does the song violate the WP:CRYSTAL section? There's a source that it will be the third single, so that's not just a fan prediction. It's not like there's chart positions on there trying to predict how it's going to chart. I just don't understand how it violates that. WIKI-GUY-16 (talk) 16:21, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- What's the point in deleting it if we know it's going to be a single? Plenty of articles on future singles that have not yet charted are on Wikipedia. Some singles never chart at all, but they still have pages. There's no point in deleting the page and then having to recreate it in a few weeks. Plus I added sources on the reception of the track, so that's not unsourced anymore. WIKI-GUY-16 (talk) 16:11, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. It is already receiving airplay, which effectively confirms it as a single. It is even already getting reviews. Nabudis Shadow (talk) 05:30, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
-
There's still not enough info on the song yet. It may well have been confirmed as a single, but I really don't see a point in making a page if all you can verify is the release date and title. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 22:24, 16 March 2008 (UTC)Never mind, I didn't see that Wiki-Guy-16 had added sources. I withdraw. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 22:26, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
