Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Last Chaos

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:15, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Last Chaos

Last Chaos (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Contested prod; prod reason was No independent references have been given. primarysources tag has been here since Februrary. Suggest deletion on basis of WP:ATT and WP:SOFTWARE (That's WP:V and WP:N now). Prod contest reason was that a search aggregate was enough to satisfy WP:N (in this case, Google - results are all download sites, forums and user-submitted reviews). When challenged to provide specific sources, there was no response. I'll also note that the MMOSite.com and MMORPG.com links are also both based on user-submitted scores. Marasmusine 15:49, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Marasmusine 15:52, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
• Strong, delete - Another article that cannot provide reliable sources to verify any claims of notability. As usual, requests for sources have been ignored on the basis that being listed on lots of download sites, forums and trivial sources such as MMORPG and MMOSite is enough. It's not. Search engine results are just as dubious a reason for keeping as it is for deleting.DarkSaber2k 15:55, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
• Week delete. Apparently-professional reviewer here gives it a good writeup, but I've failed to find any other pro reviews, and I think we need at least two to keep it (per analogy to the notability rules for books, which requires two reviews). JulesH 16:33, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete No reliable sources to demonstrate notability present in article (the four links there are MMOG funnel-sites of no use whatsoever), googling turned up nothing. As always, very happy to change position if good sources appear. QuagmireDog 16:49, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.