Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laruel Mall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nufy8 03:04, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Laruel Mall

First, the title is misspelled, though that can be fixed. The text is sourceless and unencyclopedically written, and the subject itself is a local mall that is admittedly "defunct". Opabinia regalis 02:09, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Article itself seems to make case for its non-notability. ENeville 05:00, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Would have qualified for speedy A7 (no assertion of notability). Robert A.West (Talk) 06:27, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
  • No it would not. Please read that criterion more carefully. Uncle G 09:52, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. MER-C 09:41, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. EdJohnston 01:47, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as the article fails to even assert meeting WP:CORP, much less evidence doing so from reliable sources that are independent. GRBerry 02:36, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.