Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Larry Walansky

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

  ATTENTION!

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on a forum, please note that this is not a majority vote, but rather a discussion to establish a consensus among Wikipedia editors on whether a page is suitable for this encyclopedia. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines to help us decide this, and deletion decisions are made on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

Nonetheless, you are welcome to participate and express your opinions. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments by suspected single-purpose accounts can be tagged using {{subst:spa|username}}
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Resistance is futile! - Mailer Diablo 02:26, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Larry Walansky

None notable bio --MONGO 21:13, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

  • I agree, this is a very informable source of information. This helped with my school History Fair Project. Thanks Larry! —Preceding unsigned comment added by UMFan4Life7 (talk • contribs)
  • No reason to delete whatsoever —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.144.77.187 (talk • contribs)
    • Previous comment is by User:72.144.77.187. After each comment/vote, please sign like this: ~~~~. Englishrose 21:34, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as non-notable vanity biography. Claim to notability is contribution to web design of a website with Alexa rank 228,615 [1] and forum posts to said website. —Quarl (talk) 2006-01-02 21:51Z
  • Delete per Quarl. Dan 15:40, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
  • This page is an extremely helpful resource and should not be deleted. Deletion of this page would deprive many of one of the most useful sources there is.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.188.117.68 (talk • contribs)
  • Speedy delete nn-bio. Stifle 01:39, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.