Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Larrwitt

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete as obvious hoax FisherQueen 12:11, 7 November 2007

[edit] Larrwitt

Larrwitt (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

WP:HOAX. Correct me if I'm wrong, but pretty sure there isn't an Egyptian god of sexual deviancy. Also a google search for the word Larrwitt returns no matches. ARendedWinter 18:22, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

  • Speedy Delete This is obviously a hoax. Mr pand 18:45, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete. The name doesn't even sound semitic, and neither does the mantra. --Blanchardb 18:51, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete - also could not establish any WP:RS, let alone WP:N. MatthewYeager 18:59, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Contrary to this I have found many references to Larrwitt in biblical terminology and the god was in fact worshiped. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Larryman33 (talk •

— Larryman33 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

contribs) 19:57, 5 November 2007 (UTC) Guys, I'm not an expert on this, I was merely providing a stub for a Egyptian expert to build on. I cant write Hebrew so I had to write the mantra and name phonetically. :( Sorry about that! I'm surprised larrwitt didn't come up on a Google search, but like i tried to point out, this is an ALMOST non-existential God, who isn't worshiped anymore. Its no wonder he's difficult to find on the internet.

    • Comment well, can you back up your claim? --Blanchardb 20:14, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

I found my data in the book "The the death of Egypt" Larrwitt was so unknown the only traces of his existence were destroyed in the raid of cyro undertowns in which many smaller religions were wiped out —Preceding unsigned comment added by Larryman33 (talk • contribs) 20:39, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

  • Strong Delete obviously a hoax. STORMTRACKER 94 20:50, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Are you guys deleteing my rebuttles?! I tried to say that I found out about larrwitt from Dr Jakob Stark (Writing phonetically again) In St Peterberg university. If you have any query's about larrwitt or want to clarify some larrwitt facts, goto the St Petersberg university website and send a message to them. I found they were helpful people. The reason most of you haven't discovered larrwitt is because Larrwitt was only discovered recently, because the cartouche/hieroglyph for larrwitt is very similar to the cartouche/heiroglyph of Min the Egyptian God of Fertility and Sex. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Panikmachenmann (talk • contribs) 20:57, 5 November 2007 (UTC) — Panikmachenmann (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

  • Delete, and block hoaxer. Corvus cornix 21:39, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for not being biased! Anyone checked with mr Stark yet? He appears to be ignoring me. Panikmachenmann 21:50, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Could you please provide a full bibliographic citation for this source, so that it can be evaluated? exact title, author, publisher, year, and so on. —Quasirandom 00:47, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete I searched numerous databases of journal articles that included archaeological papers and found nothing that matched "Larwit", "Larrwitt", "Larwitt" or "Larrwit". There were several results for "egyptian God of sexual deviancy" but none relevant to the subject of this article. If there is ongoing research at St. Petersberg University, it is original research. Bobby1011 01:31, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete - an obvious hoax. – Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 03:35, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete One of the most obvious and poorly done hoaxes I've seen. Edward321 04:00, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

ah Bobby, I have to assume that it is original research then, I will fight no furth ur for it. Sorry, I wasn't aware of OR policy.Panikmachenmann 20:37, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete as per the nomination, this is an apparent hoax. Yamaguchi先生 21:21, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

This isnt a hoax, but Dr Stark has verified with me that his work on this subject is still only in the research stage, and he is looking for some proof which directly refers to Larrwitt, instead of just referring to him in passing. However, it is due for deletion under to Original research....thing Panikmachenmann 22:50, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.