Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Larklight

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Petros471 19:57, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Larklight

Crystal ball article, NN author. Prod removed by third party. -- Merope 17:50, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy Keep - it has a publication date, an ISBN number etc.[1]. The guidelines for book notability aren't too picky, so probably only needs cleanup tags Yomangani^talk 00:10, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete unless notability is proven. The above Amazon link says it ranks 200,000 in the sales and has no reviews, i.e. not very notable. Han-Kwang 23:10, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Crystal ball article. Editor Yomangani is only partly correct in the quotation of WP notability policy - the policy goes on to state, "Nonetheless there is no dictum against any book that is reasonably spread or otherwise well-known or remarkable. Ask yourself if several libraries or bookshops, or a no-subscription website have a copy of the book, so that other wikipedians can easily consult the book, or at least have access to on-line or press-published reviews of the book." As the book has not been released as of this writing, and we cannot predict its sales, the book thereby also fails notability. Tychocat 09:31, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Tychocat above. --Satori Son 00:44, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.