Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Largest Colleges in Texas
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 16:51, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Largest Colleges in Texas
Fails WP:Bio the primary notability criterion[[1]]: "A topic is notable if it has been the subject of at least one substantial or multiple, non-trivial published works from sources that are reliable and independent of the subject".- topic is not notable - as compared with, say, the Big Ten (movie studios) where the ten largest of something is in wiki terms notable. Springnuts 14:10, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comment. The comparison is inaccurate, because the "Big Ten movie studios" were never identified as such outside Wikipedia. See Talk:Major film studios. --Metropolitan90 18:09, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comment WP:BIO applies specifically to people, of which this article does not concern. — PSUMark2006 talk | contribs 18:56, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comment WP:BIO is somewhat wider than just people, but I take the point - have amended comment above. Perhaps I should have tagged it "cat=I Indiscernible or unclassifiable topic". I am happy to withdraw and re-nominate, or amend the category, if the community wishes. Springnuts 20:27, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- I would say that you could just change the category and rephrase the nomination. You don't need to withdraw anything. Despite my comment above, I don't support keeping this article, but I'm not submitting a formal recommendation yet. --Metropolitan90 21:32, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you Metropolitan90 - I have changed (I hope) the cat; also rephrased the nomination. Springnuts 22:04, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- I would say that you could just change the category and rephrase the nomination. You don't need to withdraw anything. Despite my comment above, I don't support keeping this article, but I'm not submitting a formal recommendation yet. --Metropolitan90 21:32, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- delete as a subjective list without clear guidelines. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 03:25, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- delete if changed to , e.g. 10 largest ... it wouldn't be subjective, but it would be equally unnotable. DGG 04:19, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- delete per Niffweed's comments. Suriel1981 11:51, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
