Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lapine Paganism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Burn at stake. Enochlau 02:55, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Lapine Paganism

Direct quote from article: "In October 2005, the writer of this article knows only one person who follows this Relgion, himself." AdelaMae (talk - contribs) 09:43, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete - might be worth snipping bits for the humor page, but doesn't meet criteria for retention. Colonel Tom 10:01, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete - the author made it easy. JPD 10:27, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Merge to Watership Down. Don't see a need to leave a redirect. Dlyons493 13:47, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
    • Comment: redirects are necessary after merges because they preserve the article's history. Otherwise, only the person who merged the content is shown. I wouldn't care, but apparently it's needed for GFDL. We should change it so we don't have crappy redirects that we have to keep forever. -- Kjkolb 19:57, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Merge to Who stole my toothbrush? lol. i.e. Delete Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy Darwikinian Eventualist 15:56, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Pound with asteroids --YixilTesiphon 00:40, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Burn it at the stake. Vanity, adspam, OR, yuck. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 01:44, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. -- Dalbury(Talk) 01:46, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Don't delete! There's more christian fundamentalist crap than I can shake a carrot at; diversity is more fun. (User:Hazel-rah blanked the page to post this. It is that user's first edit. Firebug 23:23, 7 December 2005 (UTC))
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.