Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Language Learning Strategies
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete as copyvio (CSD G12). Now that the source has been located, I'm just going to go for the speedy delete. Mangojuicetalk 00:04, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Language Learning Strategies
This is Original research. The article being in such good form so quickly, with no wikilinks, also suggests a possible copyright violation, but I haven't located the original source. This article was previously deleted via PROD and then recreated, so bringing it here. Mangojuicetalk 17:55, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Speedy delete. Copyvio. Article even says near the end: "Excerpted and adapted from: Chamot, A. U. (forthcoming). The CALLA handbook; Implementing the Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach, 2nd edition. White Plains, NY: Pearson-Longman." This is far too detailed for a Wikipedia article about this subject. -Amatulic 18:30, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete I think this is a copyvio, and agree this is too detailed for wikipedia. If this is an Original essay then maybe it could be put in another wiki as an information source. --Lethaniol 18:41, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Comment. I have found what I believe to be the source of this work: "Annual Review of Applied Linguistics (2005) 25, pp112 - 130. It can be accessed at [1] using search term "LANGUAGE LEARNING STRATEGY INSTRUCTION". Looks like a clear copyvio. QuiteUnusual 22:13, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Comment Have tagged as copyvio based on this [2] QuiteUnusual 22:27, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Speedy Delete under WP:CSD 12 - clear copyvio QuiteUnusual 22:17, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.