Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lamit Company

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS, so keep. -Splash 21:33, 12 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Lamit Company

Self promotion of company by Expertu, ie spam SqueakBox 15:10, September 4, 2005 (UTC)

Message from SqueakBox

Please do not add commercial links or links to your own private websites to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. See the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks., SqueakBox 15:13, September 4, 2005 (UTC)

Now my reply :

I see this page is being marked for deletion :

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lamit_Company

I made a page for this company , just like others already exist in Wikipedia :

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cisco_Systems http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eutelsat http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hewlett-Packard

I do not see why is this wrong ?

Could you please explain ?

Comment. My message was a spam template, SqueakBox 20:41, September 4, 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete. I had an attempt at trying to convert it from a marketing exercise, but there's not much left. I'll reconsider if somebody can perform a better re-write. --GraemeL (talk) 20:27, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Weak keep pending re-write. I'm still not sure the company is notable enough to merit an entry, however the re-write may prove me wrong. --GraemeL (talk) 16:20, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep (formerly Undecided). Lamit has PageRank 5, which is good, except that upon Googling "link:www.lamit.ro", I see that most of the inbound links are from spammy link farms. It's a Romainian company, and its page sponsor may be unfamiliar for Wikipedia corporate page style. I'd like to know: (1) Does the company currently sell a service, or is it just planning to sell something? (2) How many subscribers does it have? (3) What unique benefit does this company provide to society?
    • I've changed to keep on the basis that the company appears to be substantial, and the author is making a good faith effort to improve the page. Jehochman 05:32, 5 September 2005 (UTC)

RESPONSE

  • upon Googling "link:www.lamit.ro", I see that most of the inbound links are from spammy link farms.

I am very sorry. You do not know the term link farm. Tell me one website that you might deem a link farm. And please do not make inappropiate suggestions, upon this. I am a respected memeber of several big SEO communities, and i do not practice such "false" or "inappropiate link schemes" . If links are to the company websites, these are from friends, other companies, or web directories.

  • (1) Does the company currently sell a service, or is it just planning to sell something?

You are joking right ?

  • (2) How many subscribers does it have?

This is not a question which you can ask, and not a question which can be asked in this situation or moment. This is not an interogation.

  • (3) What unique benefit does this company provide to society?

Again. Are you joking ?

About us and our global partners :

http://www.udcast.com/company/udcast_references.htm

About us in Google :

http://www.google.ro/search?hl=en&q=%22lamit+company%22&btnG=Google+Search

Please try to understand. If I am giving you this info, is so that i can make you understand, that i don;t joke, or make spam in your website.

Plus : please explain this : " It's a Romainian company, and its page sponsor may be unfamiliar for Wikipedia corporate page style"

I really do not understand your point.

Thank you.

  • Can someone please review what i had to say, and can we please move on ?

Thank you .


  • I will rewrite and review this article, in 1-2 days, in the way Jehochman, kindly explained in a private message.

Eveyone thank you for your efforts.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.