Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lala Gulab Chand

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 23:37, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Lala Gulab Chand

Lala Gulab Chand (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Fails WP:BIO, recreation of speedy deleted material. This person is famous for having a high death tax? Smashville^BONK! 23:18, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

• DONT DELETE:Why cannt someone be famous for paying taxes, including after death. Why only tax cheats have to be famous. In order to promote paying taxes, this article should be retained. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.68.143.142 (talk) 10:37, 27 December 2007 (UTC) Struck comment by blocked sockpuppet — Coren ^(talk)

• DO NOT DELETE: Being an Indian I know how important role this person played in the development of Community. And people paying taxes, including after death should be respected, and not forgotten. After all community enjoys the benefits from the money they paid as tax. Struck comment by blocked sockpuppet — Coren ^(talk)

• PLEASE DO NOT DELETE IT< HE HOLDS A SPECIAL PLACE IN OUR COMMUNITY —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sachin1978 (talk • contribs) 11:17, 27 December 2007 (UTC) Struck comment by blocked sockpuppet — Coren ^(talk)

• MUST NOT BE DELETED: This person played an important role in Reolution movement of India by changing the mind and operation style of Indian revolutionaries like Ram Prasad Bismil. And he payed a significant cost for helping the revolutionary movement in India. How can he be deleted??? Struck comment by blocked sockpuppet — Coren ^(talk)

• KEEP; This article should be kept. It should not be deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dksindhi (talk • contribs)

• Delete the article in the current form. Unless there are independent third-party reliable sources to ensure verifiability and not a promotional page about someone, I can change my opinion. The only reference link given in the article does not say anything about the subject at all. Dekisugi (talk) 12:13, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

• Delete as it appears to lack verification and likely was created in an attempt to lend notability to his grandson's entry and cricket league. Narson (talk) 12:56, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
• delete per nomOo7565 (talk) 18:03, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Per notability. --Sharkface217 22:47, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.