Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lake of Rage

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sango123 00:14, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Lake of Rage

A minor location in one game in the series. No encylopaediac value, badly done page, no reason to keep it. Fancruft, really. GSR 00:50, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete. When patrolling New Articles I've seen a number of these new Pokemon additions to Wikipedia. They all follow the same formula: they cover a location in the game that would for one never be covered in a secondary source (except perhaps a game guide) due to its non-notability (violation of WP:OR). Second of all, the location is so non-notable that the article could never be more than a stub due to the simple lack of information about the topic. I suggest a general cleanout be done of these Pokemon location articles to remove all locations that simply aren't important or merge them to a main article. Dark Shikari 03:14, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. The Safari Zone is notable. The Lake of Rage is not. Penelope D 05:14, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom, Dark Shikari and Penelope D. It's not notable. --Bigtop 06:57, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Em-jay-es 07:16, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Per nom. rootology 08:17, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as non-notable fancruft. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 15:40, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. A Pokemon stub that fails the Pokemon test... certainly good criteria for binning it! ><Richard0612 UW 15:55, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Fancruft. AgentPeppermint 18:12, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Acyso 21:15, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.