Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lady Anne Dudley

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 (e) 16:01, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Lady Anne Dudley

We've had this article for two years. Throughout that period it has been an unverified text dump. For a year now it has languished in cleanup hell, the result of which has been to further wikify this text dump without adding context. Notability has not been established, nor have references. Mackensen (talk) 15:52, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

• It's more then had its chance. Delete, with no prejudice against the subsequent recreation of a verifiable article with notability properly established. Proto||type 16:05, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom...verifiability issues. PJM 16:29, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete unless referenced (the one link doesn't seem to support the article). Of course Anne Dudley is real... Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 17:04, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination.--Isotope23 17:26, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete The Victoria History of the County of Warwick is online at [1] but none of the searches I've tried confirm the article. Dlyons493 Talk 19:51, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• I have no particular opinion on whether it should stay or go, but wanted to mention that I've found and added a link to the pertinent volume of The Victoria History of the County of Warwick. The info in the article is verifiable. Whether Lady Anne was notable or not is another question. Pastafarian Nights 00:22, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.