Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/La Mansion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy close of WP:POINT nomination. — Scientizzle 00:23, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] La Mansion

La_Mansion (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

Non-Notable home in Cuba. Callelinea 17:11, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

  • This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 14:48, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment Article nominated by author to make a WP:POINT about AfDs on other articles. EliminatorJR Talk 18:23, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment Can anyone check the references in a library? If they hold up, four references is enough to justify an article about a single house. Shalom Hello 16:23, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, Yes you are correct. Author of the article put article up for deletion. I believe that if this article is put up for vote and passes I will not have to deal with a future deletion vote by some other person. Yes the house is in all those books with plenty of photographs, it has refrences and is one of the most important private homes ever built in Cuba. It is considered so important that the Cuban government went as far ad spent an excess of $2,000,000 for its restoration and even contacted the original owners, the Pollack family for photos as to assist them in the restoration. Callelinea 19:06, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment Well firstly it doesn't work like that - at least one article was deleted after over a dozen AfDs - and also it's wasting the community's time if the article is notable. EliminatorJR Talk 21:42, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, I thought if an article passes an AfD then its almost imposible to get rid of it later.Callelinea 21:44, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
    • Per WP:CONSENSUS, an AFD is not permanent; consensus can change. Passing one may persuade an editor not to nominate again, but if an article has basic unsolved problems it will probably see AFD again eventually anyway. --Dhartung | Talk 22:22, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep assuming any of the print references hold up. We can tag with {{check}}, for example. I found mostly hotel booking sites [1][2][3] with limited information germane to notability (these fail WP:RS). But the cited references would be fine assuming they're sufficiently germane. --Dhartung | Talk 22:22, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.