The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. RobertT | @ | C 01:21, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
Blatant vanity/ad. Only about two Google hits. Superm401 | Talk 19:09, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
Speedy Delte Arguably meets db-bio criteria (plus it's a blatant ad). Jasmol 19:57, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
That's exactly what I said. SpeedyRenata3 04:54, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Not sure about speedy but I won't oppose it either. Rossami 02:52, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
Delete NN and advert --Rogerd 05:43, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.