Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/L E Cooper

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Rossami (talk) 03:32, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] L E Cooper

He's self-published two books, with the more successful one, The Jesus Presidents ranking #2,461,855 at Amazon.com. Non-notable, possible vanity. Carrp | Talk 23:26, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Submitter Lords Page (talk • contribs) has been spamming author and book around prolifically, and scorns those who ask him to stop, saying "you are not up on this topic enough to be editing inputs in regard to it" (User talk:Hadal). -- John Fader (talk • contribs) 23:34, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Subject is not notable. Demi 23:36, 2005 Mar 8 (UTC)
• Delete I tend to be a strong inclusionist when it comes to authors: pretty much anybody who's been published, even by an indy publisher, should get an article. This does not include self-published or vanity-press works, however. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 00:16, Mar 9, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, vanity, crank. Wyss 00:16, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, vanity. Megan1967 03:19, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. I pity whomever had to copyedit and proofread this individual's books, if such procedures were even followed. -- Hadal 04:32, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Crank. Vanity. --khaosworks 08:51, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.