Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LMN Triangle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sango123 00:39, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] LMN Triangle

Google "LMN Triangle Miami" came up empty. Unsourced and possibly OR article reads like an attempt to bolster Miami's image by comparing it to LA and NYC. SwissCelt 11:18, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete The article states that the phrase is: "not widely used in everyday conversation." This looks a lot like WP:OR. Even if this phrase exists, I don't think it's notable. Thε Halo ^Θ 12:35, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep I work in the advertising industry in Chicago. This phrase is used in our office, though not heavily. Los Angeles-Miami-New York City are the three markets that are considered "benchmarks" in the industry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.33.241.160 (talk • contribs) - IP's first edit. May be the article's main contributor. Thε Halo ^Θ 23:07, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. I can't find ANY reliable references -- hell, any references whatsover -- for this phrase. If advertising professionals are using it, they're doing it secretly. --Calton | Talk 02:55, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Unverifiable, therefore non-notable. -Will Beback 17:51, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Even a Google search of "LMN Triangle", Miami gives only two results, both on Wikipedia. It looks like OR and is certainly non-notable. Ufwuct 19:16, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.