Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LITFA

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. — Trilobite (Talk) 15:22, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] LITFA

Non notable neologism. I don't think it even deserves a Wiktionary entry. Sarg 13:47, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Comment. Not sure what wiktionary's inclusion standards are. The few google hits where this was used as an acronym were coy references to "LITFA method" to allow body piercings to heal (not computer systems, as stated in article). --Tabor 18:11, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete More like a saying than anything... ins't encyclopedic material Sasquatch′↔Talk↔Contributions 01:06, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Pavel Vozenilek 20:57, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.